I love the idea of how science is taught in a Montessori setting. There are things that I strongly disagree with when it comes to Montessori schools, but what I found out about science is NOT one of them.
Maria Montessori started these schools because she felt that “All men should come under the influence of the scientific method; and every child should be able to experiment at first hand, to observe, and put himself in contact with reality.” She promoted discovery learning and the process of science in her schools. Communicating, classifying, dealing with spatial relationships, measuring and using numbers were believed basic to intelligence. It was her view that they could be best developed by allowing the child to manipulate materials. This is the whole idea behind teaching science in classrooms and the way the Montessori schools are set up, it is perfect to really introduce the true Nature of Science to them. I found this material from an AMAZING article on teaching the "Process Versus the Content in Elementary Science" in Drake's journals (see citation at the bottom). The whole article talks about the history of science teaching and how it has progressed into this great Montessori way. "[Maria] Montessori believed that pupils in the “ordinary” elementary school sit passively a great deal of the time. The minds of these pupils dwell upon very little except about what the teacher is talking, and that these pupils do very little imagining. In contrast, children in Montessori schools are kept busy manipulating materials, gather information for themselves and learning cognitive skills basic to scientific inquiry (pg. 12)." I wouldn't say that all students check out of learning in "ordinary" elementary schooling, but in comparison to a Montessori school, yes.
Science content has an extensive history which ends with the ideas of Jean Piaget, Jerome Bruner, and Maria Montessori for their ideas on discovery and experimentation. "[Montessori] sees pupils as active explorers who are learning how to organize and understand objects and events in their environment (pg.14)." So far as my research has gone, Montessori schools may be the best environment for science education. I may not exactly agree when it comes to other content areas, however I am sure they have their benefits. Regardless, my main focus is on science content. I love the whole process of science in a Montessori setting. I could go into compare and contrast to the different schools I have researched, but I still have two more to go before I can get into that. Next stop are the Private schools.
Chiappetta, Eugene L., and Alfred T. Collete. "Process Versus Content in Elementary Science Teaching." ERIC (1973): 24. EBSCO. Web. 17 Nov. 2010.
I am not a fan of Montessori schools. First of all children need guidance so the idea that they are able to choose research and work doesn't make sense to me for reasons you mentioned. 3-6 year olds researching anything I question and the little Johnny example says a lot. How does a teacher promote uninterrupted concentration when students are allowed to wonder around the classroom at all times? How do teachers discipline in these type of settings or do they not discipline?
ReplyDeleteThe one thing I do not have an issue with is mixing age groups. I think its a great way for all ages to learn. Allowing children to learn from their older peers and the older students to teach the younger is an awesome example of cooperative learning. I'm researching cooperative learning and I think this is a great example of that.
The concept behind science learning in a Montessori school sounds great, but does it really work with 3-6 year olds. Again I feel, especially at that age, guidance is needed. And there is definitely a place for group lessons in all classrooms.
I would like to see assessments to compare these students versus public, charter and private school students. What type of school do they attend once they enter 1st grade? And how do Montessori students acclimate into these schools?